MUMBAI: Pilots have expressed their concerns about the the AAIB report . Capt Amit Singh, an air safety expert, commented: “At what stage did the engines actually stop producing thrust? The AI 171 Preliminary Report says: ‘After 08:08:42 UTC when Fuel Control Switches were moved to CUT OFF.
But in a later paragraph, the report stated the RAT ( ram air turbine ) was already deployed immediately after take-off. A simple report consisting of the collated data to date would have served the purpose of a preliminary report. This report has raised questions and suspicion about the intent of AAIB.”
Capt Sam Thomas, president of the Airline Pilots’ Association of India (ALPA-I), said: “The conversation between the pilots enquiring who cut off the fuel control switch is alarming. Another issue is, why did the emergency locator transmitter not work after the accident? “AAIB report carries no official signature, investigations continue to be shrouded in secrecy, undermining credibility and public trust.
Qualified, experienced line pilots are still not being included in the investigation team. ALPA-I renews its request to be included — at the very least as observers — in the investigation to ensure transparency and accountability,” he added.
Capt Mohan Ranganthan, a former Boeing 737 commander and instructor, claimed: “The pilot cut off the fuel knowingly. The left engine failed several seconds after the right engine, indicating that fuel control switches were cut off one after the other. The AAIB report has a lot of ambiguity.”
A senior Boeing commander, requesting anonymity, said: “The argument that since Boeing has not issued an advisory it indicates the pilot moved the fuel to the cut-off position is flawed. Lack of advisory does not confirm system safety. Several aircraft design flaws were acknowledged only after multiple incidents, history has shown.
“We know how pilots were the first to be blamed after the Lion Air crash involving a Boeing 737 MAX aircraft in 2018.”
But in a later paragraph, the report stated the RAT ( ram air turbine ) was already deployed immediately after take-off. A simple report consisting of the collated data to date would have served the purpose of a preliminary report. This report has raised questions and suspicion about the intent of AAIB.”
Capt Sam Thomas, president of the Airline Pilots’ Association of India (ALPA-I), said: “The conversation between the pilots enquiring who cut off the fuel control switch is alarming. Another issue is, why did the emergency locator transmitter not work after the accident? “AAIB report carries no official signature, investigations continue to be shrouded in secrecy, undermining credibility and public trust.
Qualified, experienced line pilots are still not being included in the investigation team. ALPA-I renews its request to be included — at the very least as observers — in the investigation to ensure transparency and accountability,” he added.
Capt Mohan Ranganthan, a former Boeing 737 commander and instructor, claimed: “The pilot cut off the fuel knowingly. The left engine failed several seconds after the right engine, indicating that fuel control switches were cut off one after the other. The AAIB report has a lot of ambiguity.”
A senior Boeing commander, requesting anonymity, said: “The argument that since Boeing has not issued an advisory it indicates the pilot moved the fuel to the cut-off position is flawed. Lack of advisory does not confirm system safety. Several aircraft design flaws were acknowledged only after multiple incidents, history has shown.
“We know how pilots were the first to be blamed after the Lion Air crash involving a Boeing 737 MAX aircraft in 2018.”
You may also like
Ujjwal Nikam among four nominated to the Rajya Sabha
Conor Bradley scores first Liverpool goal since Diogo Jota's death after perfect tribute
3rd Test: Washington takes out Root and Smith as England reach 175/6 at tea against India
Assam man celebrates divorce by bathing in 40 litres of milk
Spain floods: Freak storm plunges holiday hotspots under filthy gushing water
